Ruis v. State
134 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1020
This text of 134 S.E. 144 (Ruis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruis v. State, 134 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1020 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of the defendant’s guilt. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 144, 35 Ga. App. 591, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruis-v-state-gactapp-1926.