Ruis v. State

105 S.E. 719, 26 Ga. App. 177, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 50
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 25, 1921
Docket11884
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 719 (Ruis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruis v. State, 105 S.E. 719, 26 Ga. App. 177, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 50 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease did not authorize the verdict, and for this reason it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Padgett & Watson, for plaintiff in error. II. L. Causey, solicitor, I. J. Bussell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 719, 26 Ga. App. 177, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruis-v-state-gactapp-1921.