Ruide Zhen v. Mukasey
This text of 276 F. App'x 713 (Ruide Zhen v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ruide Zhen, native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his [714]*714motion to reopen removal proceedings in order to apply for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Zhen’s motion to reopen because he did not present any new, previously unavailable evidence to warrant reopening of the proceedings. See id. at 785.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 F. App'x 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruide-zhen-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.