Rui Guo v. Mukasey
This text of 308 F. App'x 127 (Rui Guo v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Rui Guo, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition.
On June 8, 2006, Guo filed a motion to reopen immigration proceedings in a case in which a final administrative decision had been rendered on July 13, 2004. On this record, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen on the ground that it was untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of final administrative order).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
308 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rui-guo-v-mukasey-ca9-2009.