Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.
This text of 204 A.D. 896 (Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No [897]*897opinion. Rich, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Jayeox and Young, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse, on the ground that liability on the judgment heretofore entered against the plaintiff [See 187 App. Div. 887] constituted damage. (Dix v. Jaquay, 94 App. Div. 554, 560.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruhlin-v-william-j-burns-international-detective-agency-inc-nyappdiv-1922.