Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.
204 A.D. 896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1922·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No [897] opinion. Rich, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Jayeox and Young, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse, on the ground that liability on the judgment heretofore entered against the plaintiff [See 187 App. Div. 887] constituted damage. (Dix v. Jaquay, 94 App. Div. 554, 560.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc., 204 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
204 A.D. 896 (Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dix v. Jaquay
94 A.D. 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)