Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.

204 A.D. 896

This text of 204 A.D. 896 (Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruhlin v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc., 204 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No [897]*897opinion. Rich, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Jayeox and Young, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse, on the ground that liability on the judgment heretofore entered against the plaintiff [See 187 App. Div. 887] constituted damage. (Dix v. Jaquay, 94 App. Div. 554, 560.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dix v. Jaquay
94 A.D. 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruhlin-v-william-j-burns-international-detective-agency-inc-nyappdiv-1922.