Ruh v. State
This text of Ruh v. State (Ruh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001021 10-AUG-2015 10:48 AM
SCWC-12-0001021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
RICHARD M. RUH,
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI'I,
Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-12-0001021; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0003)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on June 29, 2015, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 10, 2015.
Jeffrey A. Hawk /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
for petitioner
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruh v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruh-v-state-haw-2015.