Rugland v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Rugland v. Anderson

15 N.W. 676, 30 Minn. 386, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 164

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 4, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by20 cases

This text of 15 N.W. 676 (Rugland v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rugland v. Anderson, 15 N.W. 676, 30 Minn. 386, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 164 (Mich. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The right to maintain an action of this kind being created by Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2, is such as that section gives and no other. Nash v. Tousley, 28 Minn. 5. It is, therefore, subject to the limitation which that section prescribes, viz.: that it must “be commenced within two years after the act or omission by which the death was caused.” To this limitation the statute makes no exception, and none can be made by construction.

jLet judgment be entered in the district court for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The right to maintain an action of this kind being created by Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2, is such as that section gives and no other. Nash v. Tousley, 28 Minn. 5. It is, therefore, subject to the limitation which that section prescribes, viz.: that it must “be commenced within two years after the act or omission by which the death was caused.” To this limitation the statute makes no exception, and none can be made by construction.

jLet judgment be entered in the district court for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 N.W. 676, 30 Minn. 386, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rugland-v-anderson-minn-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack