Ruggles v. Muskegon Circuit Judge

83 N.W. 149, 124 Mich. 472, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 552
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1900·Published

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). We think the statement of lien is a full compliance with the statute. Two points only need be noticed:

1. No appraisal was necessary, under Federspiel v. Johnstone, 87 Mich. 303 (49 N. W. 581).

2. The question whether the lien proceedings are void because relators included in their statement more than was due cannot be tried upon ex parte affidavits. That question can only be disposed of upon the hearing. S. K. Martin Lumber Co. v. Menominee Circuit Judge, 116 Mich. 354 (74 N. W. 649).

Writ will issue.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruggles v. Muskegon Circuit Judge, 83 N.W. 149, 124 Mich. 472, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 552 (Mich. 1900).

83 N.W. 149 (Ruggles v. Muskegon Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federspiel v. Johnstone
49 N.W. 581 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
S. K. Martin Lumber Co. v. Menominee Circuit Judge
74 N.W. 649 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)