Ruggiero v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ruggiero v. Blum

96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19431

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 841 (Ruggiero v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruggiero v. Blum, 96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to, inter alia, review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated February 5,1982 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed the determination of the local agency reducing the hours of petitioner’s personal care services. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to restore petitioner’s personal care services to 38 [842]*842hours per week. The State commissioner’s decision to reduce petitioner’s personal care services was not supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Jones v D’Elia, 78 AD2d 890; Berger v Blum, 81 AD2d 903; Matter of Roach v Tola, 58 AD2d 652). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to, inter alia, review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated February 5,1982 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed the determination of the local agency reducing the hours of petitioner’s personal care services. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to restore petitioner’s personal care services to 38 [842]*842hours per week. The State commissioner’s decision to reduce petitioner’s personal care services was not supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Jones v D’Elia, 78 AD2d 890; Berger v Blum, 81 AD2d 903; Matter of Roach v Tola, 58 AD2d 652). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruggiero-v-blum-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack