Ruggiero v. Blum

96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19431

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to, inter alia, review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated February 5,1982 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed the determination of the local agency reducing the hours of petitioner’s personal care services. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to restore petitioner’s personal care services to 38 [842] hours per week. The State commissioner’s decision to reduce petitioner’s personal care services was not supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Jones v D’Elia, 78 AD2d 890; Berger v Blum, 81 AD2d 903; Matter of Roach v Tola, 58 AD2d 652). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruggiero v. Blum, 96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 841 (Ruggiero v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. D'Elia
78 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Berger v. Blum
81 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)