Ruggieri v. Public Service Railway Co.
92 A. 61, 86 N.J.L. 698, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 324
This text of 92 A. 61 (Ruggieri v. Public Service Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruggieri v. Public Service Railway Co., 92 A. 61, 86 N.J.L. 698, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 324 (N.J. 1914).
Opinion
The judgment tinder review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
[701]*701For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Bogert, Yredenburgii, Heppenhkimer. Williams, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kirsch v. Kijakazi
D. Alaska, 2022
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 A. 61, 86 N.J.L. 698, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruggieri-v-public-service-railway-co-nj-1914.