Ruggieri v. Public Service Railway Co.

92 A. 61, 86 N.J.L. 698, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 324
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 16, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment tinder review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

[701]*701For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Bogert, Yredenburgii, Heppenhkimer. Williams, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruggieri v. Public Service Railway Co., 92 A. 61, 86 N.J.L. 698, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 324 (N.J. 1914).

92 A. 61 (Ruggieri v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirsch v. Kijakazi
D. Alaska, 2022