Ruggia v. Washington Mutual

442 F. App'x 816
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2011·No. No. 10-1661·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Winfried and Eun Hui Ruggia appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss their state law claims for declaratory judgment, quiet title, and fraud, as well as their claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692-1692p (West 2009 & Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Ruggia v. Washington Mutual, 719 F.Supp.2d 642 (E.D.Va.2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruggia v. Washington Mutual, 442 F. App'x 816 (4th Cir. 2011).

442 F. App'x 816 (Ruggia v. Washington Mutual) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Velma v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
923 F. Supp. 2d 828 (D. West Virginia, 2013)
Hien Pham v. Bank of New York
856 F. Supp. 2d 804 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)