Ruger v. Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ruger v. Hayduk

77 A.D.2d 934, 431 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12722

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 19, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 934 (Ruger v. Hayduk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruger v. Hayduk, 77 A.D.2d 934, 431 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings, inter alia, to (1) invalidate petitions designating Arthur Goodman as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the public office of Member of the State Senate from the 37th District, and (2) permit an opportunity to write in names of Democratic candidates for said public office of State Senator from the 37th District, the [935]*935appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 12, 1980; which permitted an opportunity to write in names of Democratic candidates for the public office of Member of the State Senate from the 37th District. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings, inter alia, to (1) invalidate petitions designating Arthur Goodman as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the public office of Member of the State Senate from the 37th District, and (2) permit an opportunity to write in names of Democratic candidates for said public office of State Senator from the 37th District, the [935]*935appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 12, 1980; which permitted an opportunity to write in names of Democratic candidates for the public office of Member of the State Senate from the 37th District. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 934, 431 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruger-v-hayduk-nyappdiv-1980.