Ruger v. Belden

New York Supreme Court

Ruger v. Belden

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 405

DecidedJune 15, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 405 (Ruger v. Belden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruger v. Belden, 34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 405 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Per Curiam.

Action for attorney’s services. The services were rendered in several different actions or proceedings, running through a period of six years. According to the affidavits on the part of the plaintiffs and the pleadings, the services were rendered under several separate retainers, and' the Special Term is deemed to have so held. The value of the services is put in issue by the pleadings, and the trial will involve the examination of a large number of items of service, with a view of determining the value of each. We think the action is referable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Per Curiam.

Action for attorney’s services. The services were rendered in several different actions or proceedings, running through a period of six years. According to the affidavits on the part of the plaintiffs and the pleadings, the services were rendered under several separate retainers, and' the Special Term is deemed to have so held. The value of the services is put in issue by the pleadings, and the trial will involve the examination of a large number of items of service, with a view of determining the value of each. We think the action is referable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruger-v-belden-nysupct-1882.