Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Ruge v. Conrad

Ruge v. Conrad

689 N.E.2d 51, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1431, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 308
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1998
Docket97-2328
StatusPublished

This text of 689 N.E.2d 51 (Ruge v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruge v. Conrad, 689 N.E.2d 51, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1431, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 308 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Clark App. No. 97CA0015. The appeal of Richard Ruge is allowed.

Moyer, C.J.,Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent..

The cross-appeal of Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and the Industrial Commission of Ohio is allowed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 N.E.2d 51, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1431, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruge-v-conrad-ohio-1998.