Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
618 A.2d 348, 131 N.J. 110, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 22
This text of 618 A.2d 348 (Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n, 618 A.2d 348, 131 N.J. 110, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 22 (N.J. 1993).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 131 N.J.Super. 139, 618 A.2d 352 (1992).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Okosa v. Hall
718 A.2d 1223 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
America's Dream Homes, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of America
693 A.2d 517 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
618 A.2d 348, 131 N.J. 110, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rugala-v-new-jersey-insurance-underwriting-assn-nj-1993.