Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n

618 A.2d 348, 131 N.J. 110, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 22

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 131 N.J.Super. 139, 618 A.2d 352 (1992).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.