Rufus v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Rufus v. United States

667 F. App'x 379

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 7, 2016·No. No. 16-6120·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. [380] Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rufus v. United States, No. 6:15-cv-02127-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and- legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. [380] Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rufus v. United States, No. 6:15-cv-02127-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and- legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Rufus v. United States, 667 F. App'x 379 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 379 (Rufus v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related