Rufus v. State
This text of 2017 ND 83 (Rufus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/12/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 83
Galen Paul Rufus, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20160445
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Galen Rufus, self-represented, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521 and Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 First Street Northwest, Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Kelly A. Dillon, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.
Rufus v. State
[¶1] Galen Rufus appeals from an order denying his application for postconviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rufus’ motion to amend his application and did not err in rejecting his assertion that he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel. We summarily affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rufus-v-state-nd-2017.