RUFUS STANCLE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of RUFUS STANCLE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (RUFUS STANCLE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 23, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-2004 Lower Tribunal No. F21-10638 ________________
Rufus Stancle, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert T. Watson, Judge.
Rufus Stancle, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RUFUS STANCLE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rufus-stancle-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.