Rufus Miller v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-1707 _____________________________
RUFUS MILLER,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
September 18, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Rufus Miller, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rufus Miller v. State of Florida (Rufus Miller v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.