Rufus Miller v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 2018·No. 18-1707·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-1707 _____________________________

RUFUS MILLER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

September 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Rufus Miller, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rufus Miller v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Rufus Miller v. State of Florida (Rufus Miller v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.