Rufus Mazyck v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Assoc.
This text of Rufus Mazyck v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Assoc. (Rufus Mazyck v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Assoc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ August 26, 2014
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14A2248. RUFUS MAZYCK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ASSOCIATION.
JP Morgan Chase Bank Association filed a dispossessory action against Rufus Mazyck in magistrate court. Following an adverse judgment, Mazyck appealed to the state court, which entered final judgment and a writ of possession in favor of JP Morgan. Mazyck then appealed directly to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Because the order to be appealed disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Mazyck was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/26/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rufus Mazyck v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Assoc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rufus-mazyck-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-assoc-gactapp-2014.