Rufus E. Adkinson v. State
This text of Rufus E. Adkinson v. State (Rufus E. Adkinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00639-CR
Rufus E. Adkinson, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 67205, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Rufus E. Adkinson appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction.
The clerk’s record contains seemingly conflicting information on Adkinson’s right of appeal,
including a disclosure of plea recommendations, a judgment of conviction reflecting a plea bargain,
a trial court certification that the case was not a plea bargain case and that Adkinson has the right
of appeal, and Adkinson’s waiver of right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
The appeal is therefore abated and the trial court is ordered to prepare and file
an amended certification clarifying Adkinson’s right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(f). A
supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s amended certification shall be filed with this
Court no later than thirty days from the date of this opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 34.5(c)(2),
37.1. Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Abated
Filed: May 17, 2012
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rufus E. Adkinson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rufus-e-adkinson-v-state-texapp-2012.