Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2022·No. 22-2535·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 22-2535

Rufino John Villarreal

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Chris Bigsby, in his individual capacity; Kevin Beattie, in his individual capacity; Michael Vance; Seward County Sheriff; Maria Hatfield; Seward County Detention Center

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

Submitted: December 15, 2022 Filed: December 20, 2022

[Unpublished]

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rufino Villarreal appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After a careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting judgment for the defendants. See Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Susan M. Bazis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby, (8th Cir. 2022).

Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby (Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Blaukat
453 F.3d 1108 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)