Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 22-2535
Rufino John Villarreal
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Chris Bigsby, in his individual capacity; Kevin Beattie, in his individual capacity; Michael Vance; Seward County Sheriff; Maria Hatfield; Seward County Detention Center
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
Submitted: December 15, 2022 Filed: December 20, 2022
[Unpublished]
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Rufino Villarreal appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After a careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting judgment for the defendants. See Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1 The Honorable Susan M. Bazis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby (Rufino Villarreal v. Chris Bigsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.