Rufino Ibanez and Antonio Araiza v. Graciela Alonzo
This text of Rufino Ibanez and Antonio Araiza v. Graciela Alonzo (Rufino Ibanez and Antonio Araiza v. Graciela Alonzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M A N D A T E TO THE 332ND DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:
Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 24th day of April, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between
RUFINO IBANEZ AND ANTONIO Appellants, ARAIZA, v. GRACIELA ALONZO Appellee. CAUSE NO. 13-13-00001-CV (Tr.Ct.No. C-278-10-F)
was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged
against appellants.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
April 24, 2014.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.
WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 30th day of January, 2015.
Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rufino Ibanez and Antonio Araiza v. Graciela Alonzo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rufino-ibanez-and-antonio-araiza-v-graciela-alonzo-texapp-2015.