Ruffin v. State

652 So. 2d 1287, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4041, 1995 WL 229247
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1995·No. No. 94-2042·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand on the issue of the imposed costs of prosecution. In order to recover the costs of prosecution pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1993), the state must document its expenses, and the trial court must consider the defendant’s financial resources. See Gant v. State, 640 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

We reverse the trial court’s assessment of the costs of prosecution and remand to the trial court with directions to consider the state’s actual costs and the defendant’s ability to pay.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruffin v. State, 652 So. 2d 1287, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4041, 1995 WL 229247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 1287 (Ruffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Easy Bail Bonds v. Polk County
784 So. 2d 1173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Tarrant v. State
668 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)