Ruffer v. Waterbury Co.
205 A.D. 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1923·Published
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion to resettle granted to the extent that a new finding, No. 27A, as proposed by defendant may be inserted. Submit order. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Finch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruffer v. Waterbury Co., 205 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
205 A.D. 886 (Ruffer v. Waterbury Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.