Ruff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ruff v. State

216 So. 3d 692, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-552·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Ruff appeals his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine 400 grams or more, trafficking in cocaine 400 grams or more, possession of a structure for the purpose of trafficking in a controlled substance, and unlawful use of a two-way communication device. We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand the case to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment entered indicates that Ruff pleaded nolo contendere to each of these counts when he was actually adjudicated guilty on these four counts following a jury trial. Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court to correct the judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

TORPY, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Ruff appeals his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine 400 grams or more, trafficking in cocaine 400 grams or more, possession of a structure for the purpose of trafficking in a controlled substance, and unlawful use of a two-way communication device. We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand the case to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment entered indicates that Ruff pleaded nolo contendere to each of these counts when he was actually adjudicated guilty on these four counts following a jury trial. Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court to correct the judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

TORPY, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Ruff v. State, 216 So. 3d 692, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

216 So. 3d 692 (Ruff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related