Ruff v. State
This text of 41 So. 2d 449 (Ruff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding between Garfield Ruff and the State of Florida. From an adverse determination, the former appeals.
Affirmed. We have examined and considered the record in this case in the light of briefs filed and have also, pursuant to subparagraph (2) of Section 924.32, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A., reviewed the evidence to determine if the interests of justice require *Page 450 a new trial, with the result that we find no reversible error is made to appear and the evidence does not reveal that the ends of justice require a new trial to be awarded.
Affirmed.
ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 So. 2d 449, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruff-v-state-fla-1949.