Ruff v. Snyder

399 N.E.2d 544, 48 N.Y.2d 756, 423 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2416
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 1979·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice Paul T. Kane.

We would note that at the time of this trial, proof of freedom from contributory negligence was a necessary element of the infant plaintiff’s case. Even if there were adequate evidence of the plaintiff’s amnesia, permitting a lower degree of proof of this element (Schechter v Klanfer, 28 NY2d 228), no request was made for this charge, nor was any objection made to the charge that the plaintiff had the standard burden. The unexcepted to charge became the law of the case (Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank, 9 NY2d 829).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruff v. Snyder, 399 N.E.2d 544, 48 N.Y.2d 756, 423 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2416 (N.Y. 1979).

399 N.E.2d 544 (Ruff v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Up-Front Industries, Inc. v. U. S. Industries, Inc.
97 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Titlebaum v. Loblaws, Inc.
75 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Morrello v. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc.
75 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.
71 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)