Ruff v. Parex, Inc.
This text of 543 S.E.2d 894 (Ruff v. Parex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition by defendant (United States Gypsum Co.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (United States Gypsum Co.) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (W.R. Bonsai) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (W.R. Bonsai) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendants (Parex, Inc., Sto Corp., Continental Stucco Products, Dryvit Systems, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by (Parex, Inc., Sto Corp., Continental Stucco Products, Dryvit Systems, Inc.) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 S.E.2d 894, 352 N.C. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruff-v-parex-inc-nc-2000.