Ruff v. Parex, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Ruff v. Parex, Inc.

543 S.E.2d 894, 352 N.C. 149

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 23, 2000·No. No. 385P99·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition by defendant (United States Gypsum Co.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (United States Gypsum Co.) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (W.R. Bonsai) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (W.R. Bonsai) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendants (Parex, Inc., Sto Corp., Continental Stucco Products, Dryvit Systems, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by (Parex, Inc., Sto Corp., Continental Stucco Products, Dryvit Systems, Inc.) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition by defendant (United States Gypsum Co.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (United States Gypsum Co.) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (W.R. Bonsai) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendant (W.R. Bonsai) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by defendants (Parex, Inc., Sto Corp., Continental Stucco Products, Dryvit Systems, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 23 May 2000. Petition by (Parex, Inc., Sto Corp., Continental Stucco Products, Dryvit Systems, Inc.) for writ of supersedeas dismissed as moot 23 May 2000.

Ruff v. Parex, Inc., 543 S.E.2d 894, 352 N.C. 149 (N.C. 2000).

Pincite

543 S.E.2d 894 (Ruff v. Parex, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related