RUFEH v. Schwartz

897 N.E.2d 1066, 11 N.Y.3d 805, 868 N.Y.S.2d 584, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 3227
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2008·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RUFEH v. Schwartz, 897 N.E.2d 1066, 11 N.Y.3d 805, 868 N.Y.S.2d 584, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 3227 (N.Y. 2008).

897 N.E.2d 1066 (RUFEH v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.