RUES v. State
254 S.W.3d 113, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, 2008 WL 762291
This text of 254 S.W.3d 113 (RUES v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
RUES v. State, 254 S.W.3d 113, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, 2008 WL 762291 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. James P. Rues appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective.
*114 For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Norman v. State
254 S.W.3d 113 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
254 S.W.3d 113, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, 2008 WL 762291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rues-v-state-moctapp-2008.