Ruemeli v. Wilson
104 A. 667, 261 Pa. 452, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 764
This text of 104 A. 667 (Ruemeli v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruemeli v. Wilson, 104 A. 667, 261 Pa. 452, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 764 (Pa. 1918).
Opinion
Two of the three assignments of error are not pressed. The third complains of the excessiveness of the verdict. [453]*453That was a question for the court below, under all the evidence, on the motion for a new trial, and we cannot, therefore, disturb the judgment for the only error pressed. It is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 A. 667, 261 Pa. 452, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruemeli-v-wilson-pa-1918.