Ruelaz v. Leprino Foods Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 1, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01017·Unknown

Opinion

FERNANDO TAFOYA, SBN 146893 2 fernandotafoya1984@gmail.com ALI NEHME, SBN 236360 3 nehme29@sbcglobal.net 1228 P Street, Suite 101 4 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559)495-1900 Facsimile: (559) 495-1903 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff

SANDRA L. RAPPAPORT, SBN 172990 8 srappaport@hansonbridgett.com 9 LUCERO CORDOVA ARELLANES, SBN 351634 lcordovaarellanes@hansonbridgett.com 10 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 11 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 12

13 Attorneys for Defendant LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY 14

16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 17

18 ISAAC RUELAZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-01017-BAM 19 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 v. Action Filed: July 26, 2024 21 Trial Date: December 8, 2026 22 LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, 23 Defendants. 24

25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 27 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 1 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 2 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 3 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 4 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under 5 the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, 6 that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 7 Civil Local Rule 141 and 141.1 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards 8 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 11 information or items under this Order. 12 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 13 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 14 Civil Procedure 26(c). 15 2.3 Consulting Attorneys: attorneys who are retained by a Party to consult with Outside 16 Counsel of Record regarding this action. 17 2.4 Contract Attorneys: attorneys who are contracted by a Party to work with Outside 18 Counsel of Record to represent or advise a Party to this action. 19 2.5 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 20 as their support staff). 21 2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 22 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 24 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 25 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 26 discovery in this matter. 27 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 1 consultant in this action. 2 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 3 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 4 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 5 entity not named as a Party to this action. 6 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 7 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on 8 behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 9 2.12 Party: any party to this action, including the named Plaintiffs and named Defendants, 10 and including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside 11 Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 12 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 13 Material in this action. 14 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 15 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 16 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 17 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 18 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 20 Producing Party. 21 3. SCOPE 22 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 23 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 24 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 25 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 26 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 27 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 1 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 2 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 3 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 4 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use 5 of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 6 4. DURATION 7 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 8 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 9 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 10 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 11 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the 12 time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 13 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 14 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 15 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 16 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 17 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or 18 oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 19 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within 20 the ambit of this Order. 21 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 22 to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 23 encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens 24 on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 25 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for 26 protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties 27 that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 1 (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 2 Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 3 designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruelaz v. Leprino Foods Company, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Ruelaz v. Leprino Foods Company (Ruelaz v. Leprino Foods Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)