Ruelas v. City of Sanger
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | SALINA RUELAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00742-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 13 | CITY OF SANGER, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 31) 15 16 On April 5, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 17 | each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 31.) In light of the stipulation of 18 | the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 19 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 20 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 95 | Dated: _ April 5, 2024 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruelas v. City of Sanger (Ruelas v. City of Sanger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.