Ruelas v. City of Sanger

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 8, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00742·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | SALINA RUELAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00742-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 13 | CITY OF SANGER, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 31) 15 16 On April 5, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 17 | each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 31.) In light of the stipulation of 18 | the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 19 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 20 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 95 | Dated: _ April 5, 2024 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruelas v. City of Sanger, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Ruelas v. City of Sanger (Ruelas v. City of Sanger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)