Ruediger v. Ruediger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ruediger v. Ruediger

102 So. 2d 394, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2817

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 22, 1958

DocketNo. A-282

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 So. 2d 394 (Ruediger v. Ruediger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruediger v. Ruediger, 102 So. 2d 394, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2817 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to the rules of this court, and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made, and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, K„ and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI