Rueben N. Pelot, III v. Nicholas S. Cakmes
This text of Rueben N. Pelot, III v. Nicholas S. Cakmes (Rueben N. Pelot, III v. Nicholas S. Cakmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AT KNOXVILLE FILED March 8, 2000
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk REUBEN N. PELOT, III ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant ) ) E1999-02550-COA-R3-CV v. ) KNOX COUNTY CHANCERY ) NICHOLAS S. CAKMES ) ) Defendant-Appellee )
OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR
Defendant Nicholas S. Cakmes files a petition requesting
that instead of adjudging the value of the remaining interest of
Plaintiff Reuben N. Pelot, III, in their dentistry partnership,
that the case be remanded for the Trial Court to make that
determination.
After reviewing the petition to rehear and the response
thereto, we are of the opinion the arguments advanced in the
petition have merit, especially when the brief of Dr. Pelot
specifically asked us to remand the case for the Chancellor to
set a value as to his partnership interest. We accordingly grant the petition and modify our original
opinion to provide for a remand for the purpose of a
determination by the Chancellor of the value of Dr. Pelot’s
interest. Costs incident to the petition to rehear are adjudged
against Dr. Pelot.
____________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J.
CONCUR:
____________________________ Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.
____________________________ D. Michael Swiney, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rueben N. Pelot, III v. Nicholas S. Cakmes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rueben-n-pelot-iii-v-nicholas-s-cakmes-tennctapp-2000.