Rue v. Gentner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rue v. Gentner

7 A. 592, 4 Sadler 526, 20 Week. No. 19, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 509

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 24, 1887

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A. 592 (Rue v. Gentner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rue v. Gentner, 7 A. 592, 4 Sadler 526, 20 Week. No. 19, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 509 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In the early part of the hearing before the referee, some doubt existed as to the specific law under which he held his appointment. To remove that doubt it was expressly agreed that his appointment was made under the provisions of the act of IVIay 14, 1874. An examination of the record satisfies us that the form of the report substantially conforms to the requirements of that act, and that the learned judge committed no error in confirming the report.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In the early part of the hearing before the referee, some doubt existed as to the specific law under which he held his appointment. To remove that doubt it was expressly agreed that his appointment was made under the provisions of the act of IVIay 14, 1874. An examination of the record satisfies us that the form of the report substantially conforms to the requirements of that act, and that the learned judge committed no error in confirming the report.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A. 592, 4 Sadler 526, 20 Week. No. 19, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rue-v-gentner-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack