Rudy Victor Jaramillo v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 1, 2002
• Docket: 01-02-00406-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 1, 2002

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-02-00406-CR

RUDY VICTOR JARAMILLO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 11

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1042246

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant pleaded guilty to a jury to the offense of burglary of a motor vehicle. Punishment was assessed at confinement for 180 days. Appellant filed timely notice of appeal.

Before the record had been filed in this Court, ⁽¹⁾ a hearing was conducted in the trial court at which appellant, his counsel, and an assistant district attorney were present. Under questioning by his counsel, appellant expressed his desire to withdraw the notice of appeal in this case.

No written motion to withdraw the appeal has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). However, we believe that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case in accordance with Rule 2. See Tex. R. App. P. 2. We have not yet issued a decision. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

The clerk of this Court is directed to issue mandate immediately. Tex. R. App. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Schneider, and Justices Mirabal and Taft.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

"Once the record has been filed in the appellate court, all further proceedings in the trial court . . . will be suspended until the trial court receives the appellate-court mandate." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(e).