Rudy v. Troup

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Rudy v. Troup

67 Pa. Super. 160, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 363

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 13, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 67 Pa. Super. 160 (Rudy v. Troup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudy v. Troup, 67 Pa. Super. 160, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 363 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The only error assigned is, that the court below refused to allow the defendant to enter an appeal nunc pro tunc, taken from a judgment of a justice of the peace, for the reason that he had not received notice of the entry thereof. The opinion filed by the court in discharging the rule, so fully and clearly answers the appellant’s contention that it is not necessary to add anything thereto. For the reason given therein the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The only error assigned is, that the court below refused to allow the defendant to enter an appeal nunc pro tunc, taken from a judgment of a justice of the peace, for the reason that he had not received notice of the entry thereof. The opinion filed by the court in discharging the rule, so fully and clearly answers the appellant’s contention that it is not necessary to add anything thereto. For the reason given therein the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 Pa. Super. 160, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudy-v-troup-pasuperct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack