Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank

890 So. 2d 1152, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093, 2004 WL 2964720
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 15, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-5108
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 890 So. 2d 1152 (Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank, 890 So. 2d 1152, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093, 2004 WL 2964720 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an attorney’s fee and costs award which was made under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and section 768.79, Florida Statutes, based on the appellant’s failure to accept a joint proposal for settlement offered by the ap-pellees. However, the proposal did not state the settlement amount attributable to each of the appellees, as required under rule 1.442(c)(3) and Willis Shaw Express v. Hilyer Sod, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla.2003). The appealed order is therefore reversed.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Napoleoni
890 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 1152, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093, 2004 WL 2964720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudy-v-merchants-southern-bank-fladistctapp-2004.