Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank
This text of 890 So. 2d 1152 (Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant challenges an attorney’s fee and costs award which was made under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and section 768.79, Florida Statutes, based on the appellant’s failure to accept a joint proposal for settlement offered by the ap-pellees. However, the proposal did not state the settlement amount attributable to each of the appellees, as required under rule 1.442(c)(3) and Willis Shaw Express v. Hilyer Sod, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla.2003). The appealed order is therefore reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
890 So. 2d 1152, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093, 2004 WL 2964720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudy-v-merchants-southern-bank-fladistctapp-2004.