Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank
890 So. 2d 1152, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093, 2004 WL 2964720
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 2004·No. No. 1D03-5108·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellant challenges an attorney’s fee and costs award which was made under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and section 768.79, Florida Statutes, based on the appellant’s failure to accept a joint proposal for settlement offered by the ap-pellees. However, the proposal did not state the settlement amount attributable to each of the appellees, as required under rule 1.442(c)(3) and Willis Shaw Express v. Hilyer Sod, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla.2003). The appealed order is therefore reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank, 890 So. 2d 1152, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093, 2004 WL 2964720 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
890 So. 2d 1152 (Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Napoleoni
890 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)