Rudy v. Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist.
Opinion
| Rudy v Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist. |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 07740 |
| Decided on December 23, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 23, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
558 CA 19-02101
v
ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
MCGIVNEY, KLUGER, CLARK & INTOCCIA, P.C., SYRACUSE (LEIGH A. LIEBERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOSHUA M. GILLETTE OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered October 3, 2019. The order denied respondent's motion for leave to renew its opposition to claimants' motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 15, 2020,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: December 23, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2020 NY Slip Op 07740 (Rudy v. Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.