Rudy Stanko v. Ricardo Rios

366 F. App'x 706
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2010·No. 09-2258·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Rudy Stanko appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Upon de novo review, see Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam), we conclude habeas relief was properly denied. We affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudy Stanko v. Ricardo Rios, 366 F. App'x 706 (8th Cir. 2010).

366 F. App'x 706 (Rudy Stanko v. Ricardo Rios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanko v. Davis
417 F. App'x 808 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
Stanko v. Rios
178 L. Ed. 2d 7 (Supreme Court, 2010)