Rudy Neira v. Sheryl Sculley
Opinion
HE¢:eived:Zl[lEBdE?Q§ Mar 3 2015 89:333111 P[|Ul []3/(|3/2015 10:34;\}.{ FAX 2105642799 USCIS/SNA .U(}Ul/`(][)Ul
Court of Appcals Numbcr: 04-14-00687-CV 'l`rial Court Case Number: 2014-C1-05034
Rudy Ncira § IN COURT Appe|lant, Pro Sc § ()F APPEALS § Foun.h Court of Appeals V. § District § Shcryl Scully, in her official capacity as thc City Managcr § of the City of San Antonio(City) on behalf of San Antonio § Planning Commission, Appcl}cc and § BEXAR COUN`l`Y § TEXAS § Richard Hovenden, § lnterested Party § §
APPELLANT’S BRIEF AMENDMENT -Certificate of Comgliance
This amendment is add Appellant’s CertiEcate of Compliance pursuant Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(3).
Mr. Neira, Appellant, certifies that the computer program, Mjcrosoft Word, shows a word count of 2108 Words for Mr. Neira’s nine~page Appellant’s Bxief, after deleting the exceptions in 'l`ex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(l).
Prior to deleting the exceptions, the word count is 2941.
See February 26, 2015 letter to Appellant, from Court of Appeals, requesting the word count. d __
Respectfully submitted by FAX to 210 335-2762 - §§ *i;` § ,__ / ll‘_.l__`_“_" k § _' ‘1‘; Q‘@; 710/wu ' ':fj J., 1,:__ _ _ l:`_;"" §§ Rudy Neira, Pro Se, March 3, 2015 -_ -‘T_-`l“ _C,- 3015 might Robin. -' ,;j, san Antonio, Tx 787209 m
210 564»3634
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudy Neira v. Sheryl Sculley (Rudy Neira v. Sheryl Sculley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.