Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven

Ninth Circuit

Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven

465 F.2d 381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7777

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 24, 1972

Docket71-3035

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 465 F.2d 381 (Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven, 465 F.2d 381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7777 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon the factual findings of the District Court following full evidentiary hearing, Gairson v. Cupp, 415 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1969), does not apply.

As to appellant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel since his attorney did not advise him of his right to appeal in forma pauperis and of the procedure to be followed in exercising this right, we agree with the District Court that he has not exhausted his state remedies in this respect.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Upon the factual findings of the District Court following full evidentiary hearing, Gairson v. Cupp, 415 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1969), does not apply.

As to appellant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel since his attorney did not advise him of his right to appeal in forma pauperis and of the procedure to be followed in exercising this right, we agree with the District Court that he has not exhausted his state remedies in this respect.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

465 F.2d 381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudy-cruz-cumpian-v-walter-e-craven-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack