Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven
465 F.2d 381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7777
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 24, 1972·No. 71-3035·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Upon the factual findings of the District Court following full evidentiary hearing, Gairson v. Cupp, 415 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1969), does not apply.
As to appellant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel since his attorney did not advise him of his right to appeal in forma pauperis and of the procedure to be followed in exercising this right, we agree with the District Court that he has not exhausted his state remedies in this respect.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven, 465 F.2d 381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7777 (9th Cir. 1972).
465 F.2d 381 (Rudy Cruz Cumpian v. Walter E. Craven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kaiser Industries Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation. Kaiser Industries Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
515 F.2d 964 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
515 F.2d 964 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Troy William Sanders and Johnny Ray Moore v. Walter E. Craven
488 F.2d 478 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)