Rudulph v. State
110 S.E. 503, 27 Ga. App. 588, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 286
This text of 110 S.E. 503 (Rudulph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rudulph v. State, 110 S.E. 503, 27 Ga. App. 588, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 286 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
Rudulph was convicted of the offense of cruelty to an animal. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction; the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial. See Moore v. State, 121 Ga. 194 (48 S. E. 919).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maxwell v. State
176 S.E. 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 503, 27 Ga. App. 588, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudulph-v-state-gactapp-1921.