Rudulph v. State
110 S.E. 503, 27 Ga. App. 588, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 286
Opinion
Rudulph was convicted of the offense of cruelty to an animal. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction; the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial. See Moore v. State, 121 Ga. 194 (48 S. E. 919).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudulph v. State, 110 S.E. 503, 27 Ga. App. 588, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 286 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
110 S.E. 503 (Rudulph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maxwell v. State
176 S.E. 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)