Rudowitz v. Conescu

243 A.D. 781

This text of 243 A.D. 781 (Rudowitz v. Conescu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudowitz v. Conescu, 243 A.D. 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Action to rescind an agreement alleged to have been made by the defendants with the plaintiffs and for restoration of certain properties said to have been transferred under that agreement and for damages. Judgment for the defendants dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with [782]*782costs. No opinion. Present —- Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudowitz-v-conescu-nyappdiv-1935.