Rudowitz v. Conescu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rudowitz v. Conescu

233 A.D. 776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 776 (Rudowitz v. Conescu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudowitz v. Conescu, 233 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order directing service of second amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. This is an action in equity and the court can grant such relief as the parties prove themselves [777]*777entitled to on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order directing service of second amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. This is an action in equity and the court can grant such relief as the parties prove themselves [777]*777entitled to on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudowitz-v-conescu-nyappdiv-1931.