Rudow v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Rudow v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 543, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 121

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided May 14, 1931·No. No. 1638·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

According to claimant’s statement, he was the owner of a ■certain brick garage building situated in the City of Morris in the State of Illinois; that said garage was rented to the State of Illinois for the use of the Division of Highways for one motor truck. It appears that the driver of a Reo motor truck drove through the door of said garage damaging the door in the sum of Eighty-eight and 30/100 ($88.30) Dollars, according to claimant.

This court is of the opinion that the owner of the garage should take action if any against the truck driver as there must be some carelessness somewhere, and this court recommends that this claim be disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

According to claimant’s statement, he was the owner of a ■certain brick garage building situated in the City of Morris in the State of Illinois; that said garage was rented to the State of Illinois for the use of the Division of Highways for one motor truck. It appears that the driver of a Reo motor truck drove through the door of said garage damaging the door in the sum of Eighty-eight and 30/100 ($88.30) Dollars, according to claimant.

This court is of the opinion that the owner of the garage should take action if any against the truck driver as there must be some carelessness somewhere, and this court recommends that this claim be disallowed.

Rudow v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 543, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 121 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 543 (Rudow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.