Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rudolphi v. Wolf

Rudolphi v. Wolf

185 A.D. 896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1918·Published

Opinion

No opinion. Thomas, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon authority of Harkin v. Crumbie (20 Misc. Rep. 568), and Mills, J., dissented upon the ground that the finding which the verdict imports that the rain had ceased was against the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudolphi v. Wolf, 185 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

185 A.D. 896 (Rudolphi v. Wolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harkin v. Crumbie
20 Misc. 568 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)