Rudolphi v. Wolf
185 A.D. 896
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1918
StatusPublished
This text of 185 A.D. 896 (Rudolphi v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rudolphi v. Wolf, 185 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
No opinion. Thomas, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon authority of Harkin v. Crumbie (20 Misc. Rep. 568), and Mills, J., dissented upon the ground that the finding which the verdict imports that the rain had ceased was against the evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harkin v. Crumbie
20 Misc. 568 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
185 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolphi-v-wolf-nyappdiv-1918.