Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Amaismeier
112 A. 232, 269 Pa. 47, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 757
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 31, 1920·No. Appeal, No. 37·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
In the brief opinion of the learned court below discharging defendant’s rule to open the judgment entered against him it clearly appears that his petition to open was without merit, and, on that opinion, this appeal is dismissed at his costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Amaismeier, 112 A. 232, 269 Pa. 47, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 757 (Pa. 1920).
112 A. 232 (Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Amaismeier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Electronics Co. v. N. S. T. Metal Products Co.
88 A.2d 40 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Fisher v. Blair
21 Pa. D. & C. 73 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Newman v. Globe Indemnity Co.
119 A. 488 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)